3 node sql2000 on win2003 cookbook?

Can some point to a doc (cookbook) for building a 3 node sql2000 cluster on
win 2003.
thanks,
JR
You can take a look at the following link
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=260758. It deals with FAQ and also has
links on how to install SQL2000 on Win2003 Cluster. Your experience should
not vary on the number of nodes on the cluster.
Sandeep Sutari
Microsoft Corp.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Use of any included script samples are subject to the terms specified at
http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm
"jr" <jr@.jr.com> wrote in message
news:%23iyGdVQOEHA.904@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Can some point to a doc (cookbook) for building a 3 node sql2000 cluster
on
> win 2003.
> thanks,
> JR
>
|||Sandeep, can you point to similar information on the Active / active clustering, not failover? i seems to find a lot about fail over but having hard time locating faq or a how to on configuring it as multiple active nodes to share the processing load.
Thank you
-- Sandeep Sutari [MSFT] wrote: --
You can take a look at the following link
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=260758. It deals with FAQ and also has
links on how to install SQL2000 on Win2003 Cluster. Your experience should
not vary on the number of nodes on the cluster.
Sandeep Sutari
Microsoft Corp.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Use of any included script samples are subject to the terms specified at
http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm
"jr" <jr@.jr.com> wrote in message
news:%23iyGdVQOEHA.904@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Can some point to a doc (cookbook) for building a 3 node sql2000 cluster
on[vbcol=seagreen]
> win 2003.
> JR
|||I don't think active/active means what you think it does here. :-) That's a
term that was used in SQL Server 7.0 to indicate that both nodes in your
Failover Cluster were running a installation of SQL Server that was being
accessed by users. Those instances do not share databases between them, they
were completely stand-alone. SQL Server 2000 does not allow multiple nodes
to access the same database at the same time either.
Sincerely,
Stephen Dybing
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"Michael" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:538CE54C-0C3B-48B9-AD24-3E23CF18B54D@.microsoft.com...
> Sandeep, can you point to similar information on the Active / active
clustering, not failover? i seems to find a lot about fail over but having
hard time locating faq or a how to on configuring it as multiple active
nodes to share the processing load.
> Thank you
> -- Sandeep Sutari [MSFT] wrote: --
> You can take a look at the following link
> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=260758. It deals with FAQ and also
has
> links on how to install SQL2000 on Win2003 Cluster. Your experience
should
> not vary on the number of nodes on the cluster.
>
> --
> Sandeep Sutari
> Microsoft Corp.
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
> Use of any included script samples are subject to the terms specified
at[vbcol=seagreen]
> http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm
> "jr" <jr@.jr.com> wrote in message
> news:%23iyGdVQOEHA.904@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
cluster[vbcol=seagreen]
> on
sql